The Recurring Problem: A Managed Services Story–Chapter 7

Previously – https://blog.ciaops.com/2026/07/31/the-recurring-problem-a-managed-services-story-chapter-6/

image

The transformation that followed took the better part of eighteen months, and it was messier and slower than any tidy retelling makes it sound. Priya led it, with a whiteboard in her office that eventually filled an entire wall.

image

The first and hardest change was financial. Bridgepoint stopped selling hourly project work as its default and began requiring every new client, and every renewing one, to move onto a tiered managed-services contract with a three-year term — not because Priya loved locking clients in, but because Renata’s numbers had made the logic unavoidable: longer, deeper contracts weren’t just more predictable, they were worth measurably more, and clients who wouldn’t commit to a real partnership usually weren’t clients worth keeping anyway. It cost Bridgepoint two accounts that flatly refused the new terms. It gained the company, within a year, a recurring-revenue base that had climbed from 46 percent to 71 percent of total revenue, on its way toward the 85-percent target Priya had written at the top of the whiteboard and circled twice.

image

The second change was strategic focus. Rather than continuing to be everything to everyone, Bridgepoint made a deliberate bet on two verticals where it already had real experience: healthcare and light manufacturing. It hired a part-time compliance consultant with a HIPAA background, built a documented incident-response playbook mapped explicitly to healthcare regulatory requirements, and began marketing itself, for the first time in its history, as something other than a friendly generalist. The pitch decks stopped saying “we support any business” and started saying “we understand what a HIPAA auditor is going to ask you, because we’ve already answered it forty times.” Pricing for the healthcare tier came in meaningfully higher than the old flat rate — clients paid it without much argument, because for the first time, the price reflected expertise they could see, not just hours they were trusting someone to bill honestly.

image

The third change was the one Tom Baptiste’s plant-manager scare had made unavoidable: Bridgepoint built an actual AI governance offering, something that hadn’t existed anywhere in its service catalog eighteen months earlier. It started small — a one-time “AI readiness assessment” that inventoried every AI tool a client’s employees were already using, sanctioned or not, and flagged where sensitive data might be leaking to public tools nobody in leadership had approved. It grew into an ongoing service: written AI usage policies tailored to each client, ongoing monitoring for unsanctioned tool use, and, for the healthcare and finance clients who needed it, documentation aligned with emerging frameworks their own auditors were starting to ask about. It was Aisha’s idea, developed with a compliance consultant Priya brought in, and it became, within a year, one of the highest-margin services Bridgepoint had ever sold — not because it required expensive infrastructure, but because it required exactly the kind of judgment Jordan and his fellow senior technicians actually had, applied to a problem clients didn’t know how to solve themselves.

image

“We spent eight years being the people who fixed what broke,” Priya said, at the leadership offsite where she presented the first full year of results. “We’re spending the next eight being the people who tell clients what’s about to break, and what they’re not allowed to plug into their network without asking us first. That’s a completely different business. It just happens to be run by the same people.”

image

Why I Wrote Is the Traditional MSP and TSP Business Model Becoming Obsolete?

image

Over the last few years I’ve had the same conversation with MSP owners dozens of times.

It usually starts with a variation of the same question:

“We’re still growing, so why do people keep telling us our business model is under threat?”

It’s a fair question.

Most MSPs are not seeing clients disappear overnight. The demand for technology remains strong. Microsoft 365 continues to expand. Security requirements continue to increase. Businesses still need trusted advisers to help them navigate increasingly complex technology environments.

So why the concern?

Because I believe many MSPs are measuring the health of their business using indicators that are becoming less relevant.

That belief is what led me to write Is the Traditional MSP and TSP Business Model Becoming Obsolete? The report examines the growing gap between providers that are adapting to AI, automation and changing customer expectations, and those that are still relying on assumptions that worked a decade ago.


The question isn’t whether MSPs survive

One of the biggest misunderstandings in the market today is the idea that MSPs are somehow disappearing.

I don’t believe that completely.

In fact, I believe businesses will need trusted technology partners more than ever.

What I do think is disappearing is the value attached to many traditional activities that MSPs have historically relied upon.

Routine administration is becoming increasingly automated.

Security expectations are rising.

Clients are becoming more outcome focused.

AI is changing how work is performed inside both customer organisations and service providers.

The real question is not whether MSPs survive.

The real question is whether the way many MSPs currently operate remains commercially attractive over the next decade.

That distinction matters.


Why I decided to research the issue properly

There is no shortage of opinions about AI and the future of managed services.

Unfortunately, there is also no shortage of hype.

I wanted something different.

I wanted evidence.

I wanted current financial benchmarks, analyst forecasts, industry data, acquisition trends and market observations pulled together into a single document that leaders could use to make strategic decisions. The publication is positioned as an evidence-based strategic report focused on AI, automation, platform shifts and their impact on MSPs and TSPs. [directorci…umroad.com]

Most importantly, I wanted a resource that challenged both sides of the argument.

The report doesn’t simply assume every traditional provider is doomed. Nor does it assume technology will magically solve every business problem.

Instead, it looks at what is actually happening in the market and asks a more practical question:

“What would a successful MSP look like in 2030?”


What readers will gain

When I speak with MSP owners, many are wrestling with the same strategic challenges:

  • How does AI affect our service model?

  • What happens when automation reduces labour requirements?

  • How should we price services in the future?

  • Where does Microsoft Copilot fit?

  • What capabilities should we invest in now?

  • How do we increase the value of our business?

Those are boardroom questions, not technical questions.

The report explores these issues and examines why security, AI-enabled services, automation and outcome-focused engagements are becoming increasingly important growth areas. It also discusses transformation approaches and includes a practical action framework aimed at helping providers prepare for the future. [directorci…umroad.com]

As someone who spends a large part of my time helping organisations get ready for Microsoft 365 Copilot, I see a similar pattern everywhere.

Technology is no longer the difficult part.

Change is.

The providers that learn how to guide customers through governance, security, productivity and AI adoption will have an advantage that goes well beyond technical expertise.


This report is really about decisions

At its core, this publication is not a technology report.

It is a business strategy report.

It is designed for MSP owners, technology service providers, Microsoft partners, consultants and investors who want a clearer view of where the industry is heading and what actions may be required to remain competitive. [directorci…umroad.com]

If you already believe everything is fine, the report may challenge your assumptions.

If you are worried about the future, the report may give you a clearer framework for evaluating your options.

Either way, my goal was to provide a practical, evidence-based resource that helps leaders make better decisions during a period of significant industry change.

Because the biggest risk facing most MSPs today is not AI.

It’s assuming tomorrow will look enough like yesterday that no meaningful change is required.

If you’re serious about understanding where managed services may be heading over the next decade, I believe this report will be a worthwhile investment.

Learn more here: Is the Traditional MSP and TSP Business Model Becoming Obsolete?

The Recurring Problem: A Managed Services Story–Chapter 6

Previously – https://blog.ciaops.com/2026/07/30/the-recurring-problem-a-managed-services-story-chapter-5/

image

Dave called Aisha into his office the following Monday, alone, no leadership meeting audience. “Tell me honestly,” he said. “If we actually did this — really did it, not a five-hundred-ticket trial license — what would it take, and what would break?”

Aisha, to her credit, didn’t gloat. She pulled up a proposal she’d apparently been quietly refining for months on the assumption nobody would ever ask to see it. A tiered rollout: automated triage and resolution for the top eight ticket categories that accounted for nearly sixty percent of volume; predictive monitoring that could flag failing hardware and unusual network behavior before clients ever noticed a problem, instead of after; and, critically, a real security escalation path with automated paging, not a shared inbox and a prayer.

image

“What would it take?” she said. “Budget, about $140,000 in tooling and integration over the first year. What would break — that’s the harder question. Not the technology. The technology works; I’ve been running the proof of concept for months and the failure rate on auto-resolved tickets is under two percent, and every one of those gets caught and escalated to a human, not silently dropped. What breaks is the team, if we don’t handle this right. Jordan thinks this is about replacing him. It isn’t. But if we don’t say that out loud, clearly, more than once, he’s going to be right to be angry, because nobody will have told him otherwise.”

image

Dave took that seriously enough to have the conversation with Jordan directly, which was, in its own way, harder than the conversation with Renata Cole had been. They sat in the break room after hours, two coffees going cold.

“I’m not going to pretend some of this doesn’t automate work you currently do,” Dave said. “It does. Password resets. Basic troubleshooting. The stuff that’s been eating your week. What I need from you isn’t to compete with it. It’s the thing it can’t do — sit with Tom Baptiste and tell him honestly what his plant manager’s AI habit is going to cost him if nobody manages it, or walk into a room with a healthcare compliance officer and speak their language because you’ve done it for eleven years. I can’t automate the part where clients trust you. I can only automate the part where they don’t need to wait nineteen hours for a password reset while they’re deciding whether they still do.”

Jordan didn’t answer right away. “So my job changes,” he finally said. “From doing the work to explaining the work.”

“Your job changes from being the guy who shows up,” Dave said, “to being the guy clients call before they know they have a problem. That’s a better job than the one you have now. It’s just not the one you were trained to think you were signing up for.”

image

It wasn’t a clean resolution. Jordan stayed skeptical for months, and two of Bridgepoint’s other senior technicians left over the following year — one retired early, one took a role at a competitor that hadn’t changed anything and, as far as anyone could tell, was quietly struggling because of it. But Jordan stayed, and by the following spring he had become, somewhat to his own surprise, the person clients most wanted running their onboarding calls for the company’s new security offering, because he was the one person in the building who could explain, in plain language and without a sales pitch, exactly why it mattered.

image

More Consumption Doesn’t Mean More Progress

image

I had a conversation last week that’s stuck with me. Someone was telling me, with real pride, how productive their week had been. They’d cleared every email, sat through nine meetings, skimmed four reports and watched a couple of webinars. By Friday they were wrung out. So I asked the obvious question: what actually changed because of all that? There was a long pause. The honest answer was, not much. They’d taken in a mountain of information and moved almost nothing forward.

That gap — between taking things in and actually getting somewhere — is something I keep coming back to.

Busy is not the same as moving

It has never been easier to consume. Open Outlook and Copilot will boil a forty-message thread down to a few lines before you’ve read the subject. Miss a Teams meeting and the recap is sitting there waiting for you. Ask Copilot in Word to turn a thirty-page document into five points and it’s done in seconds. All of it genuinely useful. But here’s the trap I keep watching people fall into: they mistake the speed of consuming for the act of progressing.

Reading a summary feels like work. It isn’t. It’s the warm-up to work. That summary only earns its place if it leads to a decision, a reply, a change of plan — something that wasn’t true before you read it.

The point of a summary is what you do next

When I use Copilot to catch up on a noisy channel, the value was never the recap itself. It’s the one thing the recap surfaces — the client still waiting on an answer, the date that quietly moved, the call only I can make. If I read the summary and slide straight into the next one, I’ve consumed, but I haven’t progressed a single step.

So I’ve started asking Copilot a different kind of question. Not “summarise this thread,” but “what here needs a decision from me?” In Outlook, instead of “what’s in my inbox,” I’ll ask what’s waiting on a reply from me specifically. It’s a small change in wording, but it shifts Copilot from a faster way to take things in into a prompt to actually act.

More input, fewer outcomes

The real risk in all this capability is sheer volume. Because we can now process more, we start to feel we should. More reports, more recaps, more dashboards, more catch-ups. But a business doesn’t run on how much its people have read this week. It runs on what they decided, finished and delivered.

I’d rather end a week having genuinely moved three things forward than having consumed everything that landed on my desk. Copilot is brilliant at clearing the path — pulling the signal out of a crowded SharePoint site, drafting a first version in Word, getting the numbers into shape in Excel. But once the path is clear, walking down it is still on me.

The tools will keep getting faster at feeding us information, and that’s not the part I’m watching. I’m watching whether all that speed actually changes what we do — or whether we just get very good at staying busy. Consumption is effortless now. Progress still needs a decision, and that’s the one thing no tool will make for you.

The Recurring Problem: A Managed Services Story–Chapter 5

Previouslyhttps://blog.ciaops.com/2026/07/29/the-recurring-problem-a-managed-services-story-chapter-4/

image

The idea of selling Bridgepoint, or at least taking on a growth investor, had floated around Dave’s head for a couple of years, mostly as a retirement fantasy he indulged on long drives. In March, half out of curiosity and half because losing Lakeside had rattled him more than he wanted to admit, he agreed to a preliminary valuation conversation with an M&A advisory firm that specialized in IT services roll-ups. Marcus had a contact; the meeting cost nothing but an afternoon.

The advisor, a clipped, unsentimental woman named Renata Cole, walked Dave and Priya through Bridgepoint’s financials with the emotional affect of someone reading a weather report. Revenue: $9.4 million. EBITDA: roughly $1.6 million, a healthy-looking 17 percent margin. Dave had always been quietly proud of that number.

“Your EBITDA is fine,” Renata said. “Your multiple is going to be a problem.”

“Explain that to me,” Dave said.

image

“At your size, with your revenue mix, buyers in this market are going to look at three things before they look at anything else,” she said, ticking them off on her fingers. “First: what percentage of your revenue is contracted, recurring, and sticky, versus one-off project work that could evaporate next quarter. Second: how concentrated your revenue is in your largest clients. Third: whether you have any real differentiation, or whether you’re a generalist competing on relationships and price. On the first, you’re sitting around forty-six percent recurring revenue — buyers want to see north of eighty-five percent before they’ll pay a premium multiple. On the second, your largest client is nineteen percent of revenue, and buyers get nervous well before that; anything over twenty to twenty-five percent concentrated in one account is a red flag they’ll price into the offer. On the third — no offense, Dave — ‘we’ve been doing this for eight years and our clients like us’ isn’t a moat. It’s a headline that every generalist MSP could put on their own website.”

She turned her laptop around so they could see the slide. A business with Bridgepoint’s EBITDA and a strong recurring-revenue base, high client diversification, and a specialized niche could reasonably expect eight to twelve times EBITDA, even higher with a security specialization. A business that looked like Bridgepoint currently looked — generalist, project-dependent, concentrated — was more realistically priced at four to six times, and buyers would likely structure a meaningful chunk of even that as an earnout contingent on retaining the client base through the transition.

image

Four to six times $1.6 million was, doing the arithmetic Dave really didn’t want to do in front of Renata, somewhere between $6.4 million and $9.6 million — for a company he’d spent eight years and, by his own private accounting, most of his thirties and half his forties building. Not a number to be ashamed of, exactly. But nowhere near what he’d let himself believe it might be worth, and nowhere near enough for the number to represent what it was supposed to represent: proof that the thing had been worth doing.

“I’m not telling you to sell,” Renata said, more gently, watching his face. “I’m telling you what the market is actually pricing, so that if you ever do want to sell — or even if you just want to run a business that isn’t one bad quarter away from a crisis — you know exactly which three levers you’d need to pull. It’s not really about me, or about a buyer. It’s about whether your business model matches the world your clients are actually living in now. Right now, it doesn’t quite.”

image

Dave didn’t sleep much that night. He kept coming back to something Aisha had said in November, dismissed at the time as youthful overconfidence: You’re spending forty percent of your week resetting passwords. That’s not judgment. That’s just volume.

For the first time, he let himself actually finish the thought he’d been avoiding for a year: Bridgepoint wasn’t losing because it was doing anything badly. It was losing because it was doing, extremely well, a version of the job that increasingly nobody needed done that way anymore.

image

When Everyone Has the Expert in the Room

image

For most of my working life, expertise has been a bottleneck. The person who really understood how to structure a sound investigation, write a watertight scope of work, run a proper risk assessment, or close out a project without loose ends — that person was rare, busy, and usually expensive. Their knowledge lived in their head, in a handful of dog-eared templates, or in a methodology a consulting firm guarded like a recipe. If you wanted the good version of something, you waited for the expert, or you paid for them, or you simply went without and hoped your rough effort was good enough.

So here is the question I keep turning over: what happens to a business when those world-class practices stop being scarce? When the best way to do a thing is no longer trapped in one person’s experience, but packaged as a skill that anyone can call on, inside the tools they already use every day?

We are closer to that than most people realise.

The recipe leaves the head of the chef

Think about what a “best practice” actually is. It’s a sequence of good decisions someone learned the hard way, refined over years, and turned into a repeatable approach. The hard part was never the steps themselves — it was knowing them, and knowing when to apply them.

Copilot changes who has access to that sequence. With agents and custom skills, an organisation can take its genuinely good way of doing something — the proposal process the best salesperson uses, the onboarding checklist that actually works, the way the sharpest analyst pressure-tests a forecast — and make it available to everyone. Not as a PDF nobody reads, but as something you ask for in the flow of work. You’re in Word drafting a statement of work, and the expert method is right there. You’re in Excel staring at a model, and Copilot applies the same scrutiny your best analyst would, in the same Excel you already had open.

The recipe leaves the head of the chef. And once it does, the people who were never going to become experts can still produce expert-grade work.

The gap that quietly disappears

I find this genuinely interesting, because of what it does to the gap between the few and the many.

In most businesses there’s an enormous distance between your top performer and your average one. Not because the average person isn’t capable, but because they never had the top performer’s accumulated judgement. When that judgement becomes a skill anyone can invoke — when the new hire in their second week can ask Copilot to apply the company’s proven method and get most of the way there — that gap narrows fast.

I’ve watched a junior team member produce a client response that, two years ago, would have needed three rounds of review from someone senior. The senior person still added value. But the starting point was already good, because the method was baked in rather than carried around in someone’s memory. That’s a different shape of organisation. The floor rises. The distance between your best and your rest gets smaller.

And that should make business leaders pause, because so much of how we structure teams, pay people, and value experience assumes that gap stays wide.

When the answer is cheap, the action becomes everything

Here’s the part I think is easy to miss. If the best way to do something is available to everyone — including your competitors — then knowing the best practice stops being an advantage. Everyone has it. It becomes table stakes.

So what’s left? Judgement about which problem to point it at. Taste about what “good” actually means for your customers. And the plain willingness to act. When the expert method is in the room, the question shifts from who knows how to who actually does something with it.

I’ve seen two businesses with the same tools and the same access. One treats Copilot as a curiosity someone in IT is “looking into.” The other has quietly rebuilt how its people work — its real methods captured as agents in Teams, surfaced where decisions get made, used a hundred times a day. Same starting line. Wildly different outcomes. The difference wasn’t the technology. It was the decision to act on it.

That’s the uncomfortable, liberating truth of broadly available expertise. It doesn’t reward the people who hoarded knowledge. It rewards the ones who move.

What I’m watching

I don’t think this makes expertise worthless — I think it relocates it. The value moves from holding the knowledge to deciding what to do with it, and to having the judgement to know when the expert method is wrong for this particular case. Those things are harder to automate, and they’re suddenly worth far more.

What I’m watching for is which organisations notice the shift early. The ones who capture their best practices as Copilot skills and put them in everyone’s hands aren’t just becoming more efficient. They’re flattening a hierarchy that has shaped business for a very long time. The expert is no longer a bottleneck. The expert is in the room — for everyone, all the time.

The only question left is what you do now that they are.

The Recurring Problem: A Managed Services Story–Chapter 4

Previously –  https://blog.ciaops.com/2026/07/28/the-recurring-problem-a-managed-services-story-chapter-3/

image

Denise Okafor called on a Thursday in February, and this time there was no anger in her voice at all, which was somehow worse. “We’re moving our IT relationship to Meridian Health IT at the end of our contract term,” she said. “They only work with medical practices. Their entire pitch was built around HIPAA and nothing else. Dave, I like you. I’ve liked working with Bridgepoint for six years. But I can’t keep explaining to my board why our IT provider treats a medical practice exactly the same as a landscaping company. We need a security team that speaks our language natively, not one that’s learning it because we complained.”

image

Bridgepoint’s ninety-day notice clock started that afternoon. $640,000 in annual revenue — nearly seven percent of the company’s total — was walking out the door, and it was walking toward a competitor that had done exactly one thing Bridgepoint hadn’t: picked an industry, gone deep, and built a service around that industry’s specific compliance reality instead of a generic bundle stretched to cover everyone.

Dave took the loss personally, because it was personal — Lakeside had been one of his first ten clients — but the number that actually kept him up that week wasn’t the $640,000. It was something Marcus said almost in passing, trying to soften the blow: “At least it wasn’t Baptiste. If we lost Baptiste on top of this, that’d be real trouble.”

image

Baptiste Manufacturing was Bridgepoint’s single largest client, at just under 19 percent of total revenue — a family-owned metal fabrication company that Tom Baptiste had built up from his father’s two-man machine shop. Dave hadn’t thought about customer concentration in those terms before. He thought about it constantly after that.

Two weeks later, he got a call from Tom that gave him a preview of exactly how that could go. Baptiste’s plant manager had started using a free AI chatbot to draft supplier emails and, it turned out, to summarize confidential pricing data from a shared drive he didn’t fully understand the access permissions on. Nothing had leaked — yet — but Tom had found out from his own son, who worked on the shop floor and had seen it happening, and he was furious that nobody at Bridgepoint had ever mentioned that this was even a risk worth managing.

“You guys handle our computers,” Tom said. “Isn’t this exactly the kind of thing you’re supposed to be telling us about?”

image

Dave didn’t have an answer for that either. Bridgepoint had never offered anything resembling a policy for how clients’ own employees used AI tools, because as recently as eighteen months earlier, it hadn’t occurred to anyone that this was IT’s job to manage. It clearly was now. Somebody was going to own that conversation with clients. Dave just didn’t know yet whether it would be Bridgepoint or whoever Bridgepoint’s next competitor turned out to be.

image

The Recurring Problem: A Managed Services Story–Chapter 3

Previously – https://blog.ciaops.com/2026/07/27/the-recurring-problem-a-managed-services-story-chapter-2/

image

Aisha Malik had joined Bridgepoint two years earlier, straight out of a cybersecurity program, and had spent most of that time being the youngest, quietest person in every meeting she sat in. She stopped being quiet in November.

“I’ve been running a side project for about six weeks,” she told the leadership team, sliding a laptop across the conference table so Priya could see the screen. “I connected an AI ticket-triage tool to our help desk queue — just a trial license, I didn’t need budget approval, it’s free up to five hundred tickets a month. It auto-categorizes incoming tickets, resolves the routine stuff — password resets, printer errors, access requests — without a human touching them, and escalates anything that looks like a security event immediately, to an actual person, with a page, not an email that sits in an inbox.”

“And?” Dave said, arms crossed, in the posture Priya privately called his skeptical-uncle stance.

“And our median resolution time on the tickets it touched dropped from about nineteen hours to just over four,” Aisha said. “On the security-flagged subset — the stuff that mattered most after what happened with Lakeside — it dropped to under thirty minutes, because it doesn’t sleep, and it doesn’t leave things in a queue over a weekend.”

Jordan, who had been with Bridgepoint since year two and trained half the technicians in the room, didn’t wait to be invited into the conversation. “So what, we replace the overnight tech with a chatbot and call it a security program? I’ve been doing this eleven years. I know these networks better than any script ever will. You want to hand Lakeside’s compliance problem to a language model?”

“I don’t want to hand anything to anybody,” Aisha said, more evenly than her twenty-six years might have suggested. “I want the routine stuff off your plate so you can spend your time on the things that actually need eleven years of judgment. Right now you’re spending forty percent of your week resetting passwords. That’s not judgment. That’s just volume.”

The room went quiet in the particular way rooms go quiet when somebody has said something true that other people would rather not examine too closely.

Dave ended the meeting without a decision, which was its own kind of decision. Driving home that night, he found himself doing math he hadn’t done in years: what percentage of Bridgepoint’s revenue was actually predictable, contracted, recurring money, versus the unpredictable project work Marcus chased every quarter. He guessed, generously, somewhere around fifty percent. He would later find out he was wrong, and not in the direction he hoped.

image

For the next several months, Dave did what a lot of successful founders do when the evidence starts contradicting the story they’ve told themselves for a decade: he found reasons the evidence didn’t apply to him. AI was hype, aimed at enterprises with budgets Bridgepoint’s clients didn’t have. Sentio Cyber would burn out; boutique undercutters always did. Lakeside’s incident was a one-off, a process gap, not a symptom. He said some version of “we’ll keep an eye on it” in four consecutive leadership meetings, and each time, Priya wrote the date in a notebook she kept for exactly this purpose.

image