From Promises to Proof: Why the Old MSP Sales Model Is Dead

image

For a long time, the MSP industry has run on promises.

“We’ll improve your security.”
“We’ll make you more productive.”
“We’ll reduce risk and save you money.”

And to be fair, those promises were often true. The problem is that customers were expected to believe us. They had to trust that the value would show up later, after the contract was signed, the project delivered, and the invoices paid.

That model is breaking down fast.

Not because MSPs suddenly became less trustworthy, but because buyers changed.

The old model: tease the value, explain later

The traditional MSP sales approach looks something like this:

  • Big claims about outcomes

  • Vendor slides full of features

  • A proposal full of future‑tense language

  • “Once this is in place, you’ll see the benefits”

It relies heavily on trust, authority, and reputation. It assumes the customer is willing to take a leap of faith.

That worked when:

  • IT was mysterious

  • The MSP was the only “expert” in the room

  • Customers had limited alternatives

  • The risk of switching providers felt high

Today, none of that is true.

Customers are more informed, more sceptical, and more overwhelmed than ever. They’ve heard the promises before. Often from you. Often from your competitors. Often from vendors themselves.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth: most MSPs sound exactly the same.

The new model: show me, don’t tell me

The new buying model is about proof, not promises.

Customers don’t want to hear what could happen. They want to see what is happening.

They want:

  • Evidence

  • Demonstrations

  • Baselines

  • Before‑and‑after comparisons

They want confidence that the value already exists, not faith that it might appear later.

This shift is subtle but profound. It changes how you market, how you sell, and how you deliver services.

Proof beats polish every time

A polished slide deck looks impressive. A live dashboard beats it every time.

A well‑written proposal sounds reassuring. A real report from their environment is far more convincing.

When you can say:

  • “Here’s your current security posture”

  • “Here’s where the risk actually is”

  • “Here’s what changed last month”

  • “Here’s the measurable improvement”

…you stop selling and start explaining.

That’s a very different conversation.

Why promises now feel risky

From the customer’s perspective, promises carry risk.

They’ve been burned before:

  • Projects that ran over time

  • Tools that were never fully used

  • Security solutions that looked good on paper but changed nothing day‑to‑day

Every promise sounds like another gamble.

Proof, on the other hand, reduces risk. It replaces hope with visibility.

And when buyers feel safer, they buy faster.

What proof looks like for MSPs

This doesn’t mean giving everything away for free. It means changing how value is presented.

Examples of proof‑based selling:

  • Security assessments that show real gaps, not generic scores

  • Baseline reports before a Copilot rollout

  • Demonstrating how many risky sign‑ins were blocked last week

  • Showing reduced phishing clicks month‑over‑month

  • Letting customers see usage data, not just licences assigned

In other words: make the invisible visible.

Copilot is a perfect example

AI has exposed this gap brutally.

MSPs who sell AI with promises struggle:

  • “It’ll transform productivity”

  • “It’ll change how your staff work”

  • “It’s the future”

MSPs who sell AI with proof win:

  • “Here’s how many hours were saved last week”

  • “Here’s where Copilot is actually being used”

  • “Here’s the document it helped write”

  • “Here’s the meeting recap it generated”

AI isn’t sold on potential. It’s sold on evidence.

This shift changes your MSP business model

When you move from promises to proof:

  • Sales cycles shorten

  • Price objections decrease

  • Trust increases faster

  • Conversations become more practical

You stop competing on who tells the best story and start competing on who shows the clearest reality.

That’s a much safer place to be.

The uncomfortable takeaway

If your sales process relies on teasing future value, you’re already behind.

The MSPs who will win over the next few years are the ones who can:

  • Measure outcomes

  • Demonstrate improvement

  • Prove ROI continuously

  • Make results visible, not theoretical

The old model asked customers to believe.

The new model lets them see.

And once they see it, they don’t need convincing.

Learning online advertising–Part 2

This is a follow on from the part one, which you can read here:

https://blog.ciaops.com/2017/01/learning-online-advertisingpart-1.html

Before investing another $100 in Facebook advertising I went away and “improved’ the destination site which is here:

Getting Started with SharePoint Online

I added a promo video and did some work on the text while focusing on answering the need of those who had clicked on the ad to come to this destination. I focused the text on being more “colloquial” and less clinical, more friendly and less technical. I also changed the secondary title to:

If you need to learn SharePoint and OneDrive for Business but don’t know where to start, this is the solution

i.e. need, problem, solution

The reasoning for all this was that the ads were generating clicks but theses were not converting. Thus, the destination was not compelling enough. Thus, make the destination more compelling should result is some conversion right?

clip_image001

Wrong! As you can see from the above results, after 7 days I received basically the same amount of clicks and reach (so that part is consistent) but after about 2,200 clicks now in total I’m still striking out. Here’s the complete results so far since day 1:

image

Ok, so what to try next?

I’m thinking that I will now take cost of the course out of the equation. What I’ll do is throw open the doors to the first two lessons for free. That should at least allow me to see whether people are interested in the content. I’ll be able to tell that by the time they spend on the site.

image

At the moment they are only spending about 30 seconds as you can see above. If this average increases I’ll get an indication that the content is appropriate, if it doesn’t then I might need to rethink what the course contains.

I’ll also change the price of the course to $69 but give a 40%+ immediate discount back to original price of $39. Thus, instead of:

image

people who click will see:

image

Where did I get the 40% discount figure? I had a look at a few other sites that are offering the same sort of ploy on their courses and the average discount was about 40%. So let’s see if an immediate discount incentivises purchases.

Let’s now see what happens after I make these changes and we throw another $100 of credits at Facebook ads.

So if you are keeping score, it’s $200 Facebook, $0 me and I’ about to throw another $100 at this.

Learning online advertising–Part 1

There are a lot of things in this world I have no real clue about. One of these is online advertising to grow your business via the likes of Google and Facebook ads. My plan therefore is to endeavour to make sense of these and share with you my journey. So, let the story begin.

There are lot of “so called” online advertising experts out there spruiking their wares. Others I have talked to failed to provide any really concrete or repeatable evidence of the successful way that they have used online advertising to boost their businesses. This to my mind is not a very satisfactory set of circumstances. This has therefore lead me to the reality that I need to dive deep and understand this for myself, in terms that make sense to me.

I think step one in this process is to actually define a tangible and profitable goal you are looking to achieve. Something that you can measure direct clicks from online advertising to profit, which seems to me few actually do definitively. You want to know that X amount of clicks will generate you, on average, Y amount of dollars. Otherwise you are simply wasting money in my books.

So, for the purposes of my adventures here and to make measurement easier, I am going to stick to one simple desired outcome which is:

I want to boost the number of paid subscriptions to my online Getting Started with SharePoint Online Course.  

That now gives me an endpoint to take people after they have clicked any online ad. See my ad. Like my ad. Click my ad. Pay for my product. Profit generated. Simple right?

Now the second thing I did was put a hard stop on the amount of money I was going to spend before making adjustments. The amount that I settled on was $100. Thus, each time a $100 threshold was crossed I would stop and review before continuing.

image

The above shows you my first attempt using just Facebook ads. For my $100 I received about 86,000 views and about 1,100 clicks. That is a conversion rate of about 1%, which is no unexpected from what I have determined. Now the big question, how many of these 1,100 or so clicks actually converted into dollars? Answer? Zero. Yup, zero. None of the 1,100 or so people who click actually signed up and pad for the course.

Disappointing based on pure numbers but let’s have a think about this. The Facebook online ads do appear to have been doing their work by bringing people to the online course. The problem appears to be actually converting them to buying customers. In that respect one would have to conclude that issues lie with the destination not the online ad. Something about the destination site is not resonating with people. In short, the destination is not making the value statement well enough.

Of course there could be other factors such as the online ads attracting the wrong demographic and so on. However, I need to pick something to focus on and adjust so, to me, the most obvious is that the destination is failing to convert.

Thus, the next step in this learning process is to revamp the destination and make it more appealing and more focused on conversion. I’ve got some ideas on some improvements that can be made and once these are done I’ll click off the next $100 spend with Facebook online ads and see what results that produces. I’ll also spend more time doing research about this whole online advertising process and report back my findings.

However, in summary I would suggest:

1. Start with a well defined goal you want your online advertising to achieve. Something that is measurable.

2. Aim to have a clear path from your online advertising to profit. Be very clear about how a click on an online ad is going to generate you profit.

3. Place a spending limit on your advertising at which point to can stop and review the success of your campaign.

4. Understand where issues lie. Getting people to click or converting them after they have clicked. The process is not just a single component, there are many moving parts here.

Finally, remember that no matter what anyone says, simply throwing up online advertising is no automatic guarantee of success. Although many claim to be doing it successfully most aren’t (from what I see) so always base decisions on hard evidence and past performance not the emotional promises of what the future ‘may” bring with some “special” method. Science is the foundation of any art. You need to get the basics right before you gain insight.