Disadvantages of Using Third‑Party Antivirus vs. Microsoft Defender for Business

Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft 365 16 Minutes

bp1

Microsoft 365 Business Premium includes Microsoft Defender for Business (a version of Defender for Endpoint Plan 1) as its built-in security solution. Choosing a separate third-party antivirus instead of the included Defender can introduce several limitations and reduce the overall security of your environment. This article outlines the key technical disadvantages of using a third-party antivirus solution when Defender for Business is available, comparing features and highlighting the impact on security, integration, and management.

Introduction

In an M365 Business Premium environment, Microsoft Defender for Business provides comprehensive endpoint protection out-of-the-box[3]. Despite this, some organizations opt for third-party antivirus software (e.g., McAfee, Norton, Webroot, etc.) due to familiarity or perceived feature gaps. However, not utilizing the included Defender can lead to missed security benefits and introduce complications. This report will:

  • Identify technical limitations of third-party antivirus solutions compared to Defender for Business.
  • Compare security features and integration between Defender for Business and third-party antivirus suites.
  • Examine risks and vulnerabilities that may arise from not using Defender for Business.

Overview of Microsoft Defender for Business (M365 Business Premium)

Microsoft Defender for Business (part of M365 Business Premium) is a cloud-powered endpoint protection platform that includes:

  • Next-generation antivirus and anti-malware for Windows (built into Windows 10/11).
  • Endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities (Plan 1) for threat monitoring on devices.
  • Integration with Microsoft 365 security ecosystem – unified security portal, threat intelligence, and AI-driven detection and response[4].
  • Firewall and network protection, ransomware protection (e.g., Controlled Folder Access), and attack surface reduction (ASR) rules.
  • Centralized management via Microsoft 365 Defender portal and Intune (Endpoint Manager) for policy deployment and device compliance.

Key Security Features of Defender for Business include advanced threat detection with machine learning, actionable security recommendations (via Secure Score), and vulnerability assessment of devices[3]. These features are fully integrated into the Microsoft 365 cloud environment, enabling a holistic defense approach across email, identities, and devices.

Example: Defender for Business provides vulnerability reporting and Secure Score recommendations based on your devices’ configurations[3]. These insights help improve security posture continuously – something typically not offered by basic third-party antivirus software.

Third-Party Antivirus Solutions in an M365 Environment

Third-party antivirus solutions (from vendors like McAfee, Norton, Sophos, etc.) often offer multi-platform protection and additional consumer-oriented features (e.g., VPN, password manager, identity theft monitoring). In business environments, third-party endpoint protection may be chosen for reasons such as cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, iOS, Android) or existing MSP relationships.

However, when using a third-party AV instead of Defender on Windows endpoints joined to M365 Business Premium, consider that:

  • Windows will automatically disable the built-in Defender if a third-party AV is active (unless Defender is explicitly put into passive mode via onboarding to Defender for Endpoint)[1]. This means Microsoft’s native protection and EDR telemetry are turned off, unless you configure Defender in passive mode.
  • Any advanced integration with Microsoft 365 (centralized alerts, device risk levels in Azure AD, Secure Score calculations) that Defender would provide is lost or greatly diminished with a non-Microsoft antivirus.

In short, third-party solutions can function for basic threat protection, but you risk losing the seamless integration and advanced cloud-enabled defenses that are included with your Business Premium subscription.

Feature Comparison: Defender for Business vs. Third-Party Antivirus

To understand the limitations, it’s helpful to compare key aspects of Defender for Business and typical third-party antivirus solutions:

Aspect Microsoft Defender for Business Third-Party Antivirus
Integration Natively integrated with Microsoft 365 services and Azure AD; single security dashboard for endpoints, emails, identities4. Limited integration with M365; separate management console. May not share signals with Microsoft 365 ecosystem4.
Threat Intelligence Leverages Microsoft’s cloud intelligence, AI, and machine learning for advanced threat detection and response4. Vendor-specific threat intelligence; may not correlate with Microsoft’s threat data, potentially missing Microsoft-specific threat signals.
Platform Coverage Windows (built-in). Supports macOS, iOS, Android via Defender for Endpoint clients (some features require additional licenses). Often supports Windows, macOS, iOS, Android in one suite. Note: Defender needs separate configuration for non-Windows platforms4.
Security Features Endpoint AV/anti-malware, firewall control, ransomware protection, web protection, device control, Secure Score and vulnerability management recommendations3. Traditional antivirus/malware protection, often with added features like VPN, password manager, device cleanup tools. May lack unified risk scoring across org.
EDR & Response Included EDR capabilities (alerting, manual response) with Business Premium; full automated incident response available with upgrade to P2. Centralized incident queue in Defender portal. Varies by vendor – some offer EDR add-ons or cloud consoles, but these are separate from M365’s incident portal. No integration with M365 incident response by default.
Management & Deployment Managed via Intune or Defender portal; policy deployment through M365. Uses existing credentials and roles (no extra agent software on Win10/11 beyond built-in). Requires deploying a separate agent/software on devices. Separate management portal or console; different admin credentials. Limited or no Intune integration.
Cost Included in M365 Business Premium (no extra cost for Defender P1)3. Already paid for in your subscription. Additional license or subscription cost for the third-party product, effectively paying twice for endpoint protection (since Defender is included)3.
Support & Maintenance Updates via Windows Update (automatic, seamless). Microsoft support available as part of M365. Separate update mechanism (app updates, signature updates via vendor). Separate support channel; possible complexity in coordinating with Microsoft support if issues arise.
Performance Impact Designed and optimized for Windows; runs in the background with minimal performance impact. Modern tests show Defender is lightweight for most use cases. Varies by product – some third-party AVs can be resource-intensive or introduce system slowdowns. Potential conflicts if not configured to disable Windows Defender properly4.
Compliance & Reporting Logs and alerts feed into Microsoft 365 compliance and security centers. Helps meet compliance by integrating with features like audit logging, Azure Security Center, and has certifications (FedRAMP, etc.)2. May not integrate with Microsoft compliance tools. If required to demonstrate security controls (e.g., for regulatory audits), you’ll need to pull data from a separate system. Some third-party tools might not meet certain cloud security certifications2.

Table: Feature comparison of Defender for Business (M365 Business Premium) vs. Third-Party Antivirus solutions.

Limitations and Security Disadvantages of Third-Party Antivirus

Using a third-party antivirus instead of Microsoft Defender for Business can reduce your overall security due to the following limitations:

  • Loss of Native Integration: Microsoft Defender is tightly integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem, meaning alerts from devices, Office 365, and Azure AD can correlate in a single pane. Third-party solutions are not fully compatible with this ecosystem and cannot natively feed alerts into the Microsoft 365 security dashboard[4][4]. This fragmentation can delay detection and response, as security teams might have to monitor multiple consoles and miss the “big picture” of an attack.
  • No Centralized Dashboard: With Defender, admins can manage security policies and view incidents from one cloud dashboard. A third-party suite requires its own console. You lose the convenience of a single dashboard for all threats and devices[4], potentially leading to oversight or slower response when threats span email, identity, and device domains.
  • Reduced Threat Detection Capabilities: Microsoft has invested heavily in AI-driven threat detection and behavioral analysis. Defender for Business uses cloud-driven intelligence to catch emerging threats and zero-day attacks. Third-party AV engines, while effective against known malware, might not be as adept at catching certain advanced threats. In one comparison, a third-party EDR solution was “not as good at catching some issues as Defender” due to Microsoft’s superior investment in threat research[2]. By not using Defender, you might miss out on Microsoft’s 24/7 cloud analysis of suspicious activity, potentially leaving gaps in detection for novel or sophisticated attacks.
  • Lack of Advanced Endpoint Features: Defender includes Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules, device control, and vulnerability management insights by default. If you rely on a third-party antivirus, you may not have equivalent features enabled. Key preventative controls (like blocking known malicious scripts or limiting exploit techniques) might be absent or require additional products. This could weaken your preventive defense layer. For example, failing to use Defender means no built-in Secure Score or tailored security recommendations for your endpoints[3].
  • Delayed or Missing Telemetry: When Defender is not active or onboarded, Windows devices in your tenant don’t send telemetry to the Defender portal. According to Microsoft guidance, if a non-Microsoft antivirus is installed and the device is not onboarded to Defender for Endpoint, Defender Antivirus goes into disabled mode[1]. This means Microsoft’s cloud will have no visibility into those endpoints. You lose rich telemetry that could have been used for threat hunting or correlating incidents. In contrast, even if you continue with a third-party AV, Microsoft advises onboarding devices in Defender’s passive mode to “gather a lot of data that your 3rd party might not be gathering”[3]. Not doing so leaves a blind spot in your security monitoring.
  • Potential Conflicts and Performance Issues: Running two antivirus solutions in parallel can cause conflicts. Typically, installing a third-party AV disables Windows Defender’s real-time protection to avoid clashes. If not configured properly, this could either lead to resource-draining duplicate scans or, conversely, no active protection if one product misbehaves. Even with just the third-party running, some users report performance issues or system slowdowns[4]. The third-party software might hook deep into the system, sometimes causing instability or compatibility issues with certain applications. The built-in Defender is generally optimized to avoid such issues on Windows.
  • Coverage Gaps: While third-party suites often brag about multi-OS support, there can be gaps in how well each platform is protected. Microsoft Defender, when extended with the appropriate clients, offers strong protection for Windows and good coverage for mobile via Defender for Endpoint. If your business heavily uses non-Windows devices, a third-party solution might cover those, but at the cost of losing optimal protection on Windows. For instance, Microsoft’s solution doesn’t cover iOS by default (without a separate Endpoint client), which is a noted Defender limitation[4]; third-party might fill that gap. However, if your environment is predominantly Windows (common in Business Premium scenarios), the benefit of third-party for iOS may be negligible compared to the loss of integration on Windows.
  • Missed Cloud Security Synergy: Defender for Business works in tandem with other M365 security services (Defender for Office 365 for email/phish, Defender for Cloud Apps, etc.). Ignoring Defender breaks this synergy. For example, an email-borne malware that reaches an endpoint: with Defender, the system can auto-correlate the email and device threat, quarantining across both fronts. A third-party AV on the endpoint won’t inform Microsoft 365 about the threat, so automated cross-domain defenses might not trigger. This can reduce the overall security posture efficacy in your organization[2].
  • Compliance and Reporting Issues: Many organizations must adhere to cybersecurity frameworks (ISO, NIST, GDPR, etc.). Microsoft’s security stack makes it easier to demonstrate compliance through unified logs and reports. With a third-party, audit logs for endpoint security are separate. Moreover, Microsoft’s services (including Defender) have obtained certifications like FedRAMP for government use, indicating a high standard of security[2]. If your third-party tool lacks such certifications, it could be a concern for regulatory compliance. Not using the included Defender could also mean missing out on Microsoft’s compliance tools that integrate device security status (for instance, Conditional Access based on device risk or compliance requires Intune/Defender signals).
  • Opportunity Cost (Paying Twice): M365 Business Premium subscribers are already paying for Defender for Business as part of the license. Replacing it with a third-party antivirus means additional cost with arguably little added security benefit. As one IT professional noted, “you could drop your 3rd party subscription to save costs and use Defender P1 from your Business Premium subscription”[3]. Those funds could instead be redirected to other security improvements (training, backups, etc.). Failing to leverage a paid-for security product is a lost opportunity.
  • Management Overhead: Using the built-in Defender allows your IT admins to use familiar tools (Intune, Group Policy, Microsoft 365 portal) to deploy policies and monitor threats. A third-party solution brings another management interface to learn and maintain. Any issues (like malware outbreaks or false positives) have to be handled in a separate system, which can slow down response if the team is small. In contrast, with Defender, admins can streamline workflows (for example, responding to an alert in the same portal where user identities and mail threats are managed). Third-party solutions increase administrative complexity and the chance of misconfiguration (which in security often equals risk).

Impact on Threat Detection and Response

Defender for Business vs Third-Party: Threat Handling

Microsoft Defender’s tight integration means that if a threat is detected on one device, the intelligence can be rapidly shared across your tenant. For instance, if a new ransomware strain is detected on one PC, Defender for Business can inform other devices and adjust protections accordingly through the cloud. A third-party solution typically operates in its own silo, possibly with cloud intelligence within its user base, but not with the context of your Microsoft environment.

  • Incident Correlation: In Defender, alerts from different sources (email, endpoint, user account anomalies) can merge into a single incident view. A third-party AV would raise an alert in its console, but it won’t correlate with, say, a risky sign-in alert in Azure AD or a phishing attempt flagged in Office 365. Security teams must manually piece together the puzzle, which is slower and error-prone.
  • Automated Response: With the full Microsoft 365 Defender suite (particularly if upgraded to Plan 2), there are automated investigation and response capabilities that can isolate machines, kill processes, or remediate artifacts across devices without human intervention. Third-party antivirus might stop the malware on the one device, but it likely won’t trigger organization-wide actions. Not using Defender means losing the ability for Microsoft’s AI to auto-heal incidents in many cases, leaving more work for IT staff to do manually.
  • Threat Hunting and Analysis: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (even P1) allows security teams to query data from endpoints (via Advanced Hunting, if P2 or via event views in P1) to proactively hunt for signs of intrusion. If you’re not using Defender, you can’t leverage these built-in tools – your team would need to rely on whatever hunting/query features (if any) the third-party provides, or lack that capability entirely. This limits your visibility into historical data during an investigation.

Example scenario: A suspicious PowerShell script runs on a PC. With Defender for Business, even if the antivirus (third-party) missed it, if the device was at least onboarded to Defender, the EDR component could flag the behavior. If you completely forgo Defender, that behavior might go unnoticed by Microsoft’s analytics. Third-party AVs often focus on file-based malware and might not catch script-based living-off-the-land attacks as effectively. Microsoft reported Defender’s ability to “unravel the behavior of malicious PowerShell scripts” and achieve zero false positives in independent tests[2], showcasing the sophistication of its detection. By not using it, you relinquish these advanced detection capabilities.

Management and Deployment Differences

Deploying Defender for Business to your devices is usually straightforward if you’re already using Entra ID or Intune. Devices can be onboarded through a script or via Intune policy, and once onboarded, their status and alerts flow into the Microsoft 365 Defender portal[3][3].

Third-Party Deployment often requires installing an agent on each device (via an MSI, EXE, or using a deployment tool). This is an extra step that Business Premium customers technically don’t need, since Windows 10/11 already come with Defender built-in. Additionally, maintaining a third-party agent means ensuring it’s updated and doesn’t conflict with Windows updates.

Policy Management: With Defender, you can use Intune or Group Policy to configure antivirus settings (like exclusions, real-time protection, ASR rules, etc.) centrally. Policies can be tied into your overall device compliance strategy. Third-party solutions usually have their own policy interfaces that don’t integrate with Intune; admins must duplicate effort to ensure settings in the third-party console align with corporate policy.

User Experience: End-users on Windows typically won’t notice Defender – it runs quietly and reports to the admin console. Third-party antiviruses often come with their own notifiers, tray icons, or even require users to log in to activate licenses. This can introduce user confusion or unintended interference (users disabling it, etc.). Also, if a third-party suite includes extras like performance tune-ups, users might be bombarded with pop-ups unrelated to security, whereas Defender keeps a low profile. Removing that noise by using Defender can actually improve the user experience, reducing security fatigue.

Cost and Resource Considerations

From a cost perspective, using a third-party AV when you have Business Premium is usually not cost-effective. You are paying for two solutions and only using one. Microsoft Defender for Business is already included, and for many SMBs it provides “the best value” when considering the balance of cost, features, and integration[2]. Some key points:

  • Direct Costs: A third-party business antivirus suite could cost anywhere from a few dollars to $10+ per device per month. This is on top of your Microsoft 365 subscription. By switching to the included Defender, companies often save significantly on annual security expenses[3].
  • Indirect Savings: With an integrated Defender solution, you can save on administrative overhead (less time spent context-switching between consoles and correlating data manually). Quicker response to incidents (thanks to integration) can reduce the damage and cost of breaches. These indirect benefits are hard to quantify but very real in improving an IT team’s efficiency.
  • Efficiency of Updates: Microsoft handles Defender updates through the regular Windows Update channel – this means no separate update infrastructure or scheduling is needed. Third-party solutions might require their own update servers or cloud connectivity. Ensuring definition updates are timely is critical; with Defender, as long as Windows is updating, you’re covered. This reduces the risk of missed updates due to subscription lapses or misconfigurations that sometimes plague third-party AV deployments.

Compliance and Regulatory Implications

For organizations under compliance requirements, using the built-in security tools can simplify audits. Microsoft provides compliance reports and integrates device risk into its compliance manager tools. If you choose a third-party AV:

  • Data Residency and Certifications: You may need to verify that the vendor meets any data residency requirements and holds certifications (like ISO 27001, SOC 2, FedRAMP for governmental data, etc.). Microsoft’s cloud has many of these certifications, which can be leveraged if you use their solution[2]. A third-party might not, potentially complicating compliance for certain industries (e.g., government contractors as noted with one MDR tool lacking FedRAMP[2]).
  • Reporting to Regulators: If an auditor asks for proof of endpoint protection and its effectiveness, with Defender you can pull a report from Microsoft 365 showing your devices, their risk status, and even Secure Score metrics. With a third-party, you’d have to extract similar reports from that product, and they may not be easily comparable to Microsoft’s standards. This adds work to compliance reporting.
  • Conditional Access & Zero Trust: Modern zero-trust security models often use device compliance (is the device healthy and protected?) as a gate to grant access to resources. Microsoft Intune + Defender can report a device’s compliance status (e.g., antivirus on, up-to-date, no threats detected) to Azure AD. If you’re not using Defender, you must ensure that the third-party AV’s status is recognized by Windows Security Center and Intune. Some third-party products do register with Windows Security Center, but not all details may be available. This could complicate conditional access policies that require “real-time evaluation” of device risk. Essentially, not using Defender might make it harder to enforce strict access policies, since you’re relying on external signals.

Best Practices if Third-Party AV Is Used

If your organization still chooses to use a third-party antivirus despite the above disadvantages, consider these best practices to mitigate security gaps:

  • Onboard Endpoints to Defender for Endpoint (Passive Mode): You can have the best of both worlds by onboarding devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint in passive mode while keeping the third-party AV as active protection[1][3]. This means Microsoft Defender’s service stays running in the background without real-time interference (letting the third-party handle real-time protection), but it still sends sensor data to the Defender cloud. This preserves the rich telemetry and allows you to use the Defender portal for device visibility, incidents, and Secure Score recommendations, even if the third-party AV is stopping the malware. It essentially turns Defender into an EDR sensor alongside the third-party AV. Note: This requires an onboarding script or policy, as included in Defender for Business setup.
  • Integrate with Intune/Endpoint Manager: Many third-party security vendors provide Intune connectors or at least compatibility to report status to Windows Security Center. Make sure your third-party AV is recognized by the Windows Security Center as the active antivirus. This will feed basic status (like “no threats” or “out of date signatures”) into the Windows OS. Intune compliance policies can then check for “antivirus status = OK” on the device. While this is not as comprehensive as using Defender, it at least ensures your device compliance policies acknowledge the third-party protection.
  • Regularly Review Overlapping Features: If the third-party suite includes features that overlap with Microsoft 365 (e.g., email filtering, firewall, device web content filtering), decide carefully whether to use those or Microsoft’s equivalents. Overlapping configurations can cause confusion. In some cases, you might turn off certain third-party components to let Microsoft’s (potentially superior or better integrated) features work. For example, if using a third-party AV primarily for malware, you might still use Microsoft’s cloud app security and Office 365 Defender for email, rather than the email filter from the suite.
  • Train Security Personnel on Both Systems: Ensure your IT/security team is actively monitoring both the third-party console and the Microsoft 365 security portal (for identity/email threats). Have clear procedures to correlate alerts between the two. If an endpoint malware alert fires in the third-party console, someone should manually check if any related alerts exist in Azure AD or Office 365, and vice versa. This is labor-intensive, but important if you split solutions.
  • Evaluate Upgrading Microsoft Defender: Given that Business Premium includes only Plan 1 of Defender, if there are features you truly need that a third-party is providing (for instance, automated investigation or threat hunting), consider whether an upgrade to Defender for Endpoint Plan 2 (or adding Microsoft 365 E5 Security add-on) might be more beneficial than a third-party subscription. Microsoft’s Plan 2 brings capabilities like automated incident response and threat hunting that can match or exceed many third-party offerings[2]. The cost difference might be comparable to what you pay for a separate product, and would enhance integration rather than bypass it.

Conclusion

In summary, relying on a third-party antivirus in an environment that already includes Microsoft Defender for Business can weaken your overall security posture. The disadvantages manifest in several ways: you lose the tight integration and single-pane visibility Microsoft’s ecosystem offers, potentially miss out on advanced threat detection fueled by Microsoft’s global intelligence, and add complexity and cost to your IT operations. While third-party solutions can provide capable protection, they often operate in isolation, lacking the “glue” that Defender provides across your cloud services, identities, and endpoints.

By not using the included Defender, an organization might face blind spots in monitoring, slower response to incidents, and inefficiencies in managing security across the environment. On the other hand, leveraging Defender for Business (which you already own with M365 Business Premium) ensures a cohesive defense strategy – with endpoints, email, and cloud services working in concert. It can improve your security through continuous assessment (Secure Score) and reduce costs by consolidating tools[3].

Ultimately, the best security outcomes in an M365 Business Premium environment are achieved by using the tools designed to work together. Third-party antivirus solutions, while feature-rich in their own right, tend to fall short in providing the same level of unified protection and insight that Defender for Business offers natively[4][2]. Unless there are specific requirements that only a third-party can meet, most businesses will strengthen their security stance by embracing the integrated Microsoft Defender solution included in their subscription.

References:

  • Microsoft Community Q&A – 3rd party security in addition to 365 and Defender (Dec 2023) – discussing integration advantages of Defender and drawbacks of third-party add-ons[4].
  • Spiceworks Community Thread – M365 Business Premium and Microsoft Defender (Sep 2024) – outlining how Defender can replace third-party AV to save costs and highlighting Defender P1 features like Secure Score and vulnerability management[3].
  • E-N Computers Blog – Can Microsoft Defender replace your EDR solution? (2024) – a case study noting improved threat detection and integration with Defender vs a third-party EDR, and considerations around compliance (FedRAMP)[2].
  • Microsoft Learn Documentation – Defender Antivirus compatibility with other security products – explains Defender’s behavior (passive/disabled) when third-party AV is present[1]

References

[1] Microsoft Defender Antivirus compatibility with other security products

[2] Can Microsoft Defender replace your EDR solution?

[3] M365 Business Premium and Microsoft Defender – Spiceworks Community

[4] 3rd party security in addition to 365 and Defender

Unknown's avatar

Published by directorcia

Published

Leave a comment